Yes We Can

What makes a good juggler? Practice.

When you let go, amazing things happen.

Last Saturday at Whampoa, a 10-year-old who had never spoken up or answered questions in class got up and not only led her group in a presentation – she did an entire demo. Brief, to the point, and effective, Anna (all kids' names have been changed)  and her three team-mates told us to stand on one foot, and then close our eyes and continue to stand on one foot. Then she explained why it’s a more difficult to balance when you close your eyes.

Then another group got up and read an entire story they’d written - out loud, in unison. It was about an alien with 24 arms and 5 legs discovering juggling and then practicing really hard to win an intergalactic talent competition. It had a well-organised, credible plot.  Well-illustrated too.

At first I thought the 10-year-old, in the group Andy, had written the story and the rest had just drawn and coloured. It turns out that it was Shah, one of the 8-year-olds, who came up with most of the plot - and Andy was mainly the scribe.

We wouldn’t have discovered what the kids were capable of if we hadn’t let go of the agenda and improvised a little.

At the beginning of the session, we had a guest: the amazing Mickael Bellemene, contact juggler. Link here He gave the kids a preview of his gravity defying act and talked about how much he loved his craft even as a kid (didn’t like school), how much he practiced (the whole day for days on end, at one time - until he got injured) and how important it was to do things well.

Then we asked the kids to get in groups of four, come up with questions of their own, research the answers, and present - to everyone.

As with the past two sessions, we modelled the hour after Sugata Mitra's Self Organised Learning Framework in which four kids choose their own teams, share one PC, research and discuss answers, and present. The adults stayed away unless asked to help. In our case, we discovered that when we did that, the kids tended to copy and paste facts off the web, and then present stuff they didn't really understand.

We've been working on how to get over this - and the solution turned out really differently between the two groups of kids. The volunteers on Anna’s team first helped the girls come up with a narrow enough question. From my end of the room I heard words like fulcrum, flexible, balance from Anna’s group. First-time volunteer, Beverly, engaged the normally shy Anna like no one had been able to before. She and another volunteer, Hui, helped the kids come up with progressively more biteable chunks of information they could work on. 

  

On the other end of the room, Andy's group wanted to find out how aliens juggle. They went online, found some "Roswell" / alien-sighting sites, but in the end, no one could agree if the web could tell them definitively whether aliens exist. Hence the tale of Intergalactic Creatures Have Talent. Worked out fine, in my view. 

If they two things the team took away were:

- Google doesn't know EVERYTHING - really!

- and "hey, I can write and tell a pretty darn good story!"

then we'd done some really nice work that day - both the adults and the kids.

 My lesson for the day: relax, look, listen, learn. Be amazed.

Could Robots Rule the World One Day? Another SOLE weekend.

At Whampoa, our SOLE (Self Organised Learning Environment) experiment continues. It's an education - for us the adult volunteers, the senior high-school/ junior college volunteers, and the kids.

Over the past three Saturdays, we've pretty much followed the Sugata Mitra's SOLE framework: 8-12 year olds get to choose their own groups, one laptop per four-child group to research a question, each group has a helper - the only kid in the group who's allowed to be the conduit between the group and the adults, and the adults step in only when asked/ approached.

Today's questions:
1. Why are bruises purple?
2. Could robots rule the world one day?

The second question got some really interesting answers. The kids talked, wrote stuff, and didn't seem to have a consensus. One of the girls said robots were really smart and could build / make things. And that robots could be very scary - like if they were used in wars. They decided "maybe" robots could rule the world - because they could destroy buildings and could be used as weapons.


But robots could rule the world only if humans were scared of them. "But only god can destroy the world," added one boy earnestly. The oldest kid in the group was maybe 10. And a 5-year-old sneaked in today. He was the group's illustrator. He was also the one who told us, very seriously, that the Transformers are not real. They were drawn by computers - to which a 10-year-old piped up with "CGI!"

Did the group have fun? The Robot team did.

The Bruise team got a little ... bruised because the workload ended up being lopsided and one person ended up doing most of the work. That's something we're going to have to work on.

It's a process of adjustment and tweaking. Step in too much and the groups lose their autonomy. Stand back too much and the groups wouldn't get as much out of this as they could. It's so difficult for most of us adults not to plunge in and "guide" or get involved.

Lots of other kinks to work through - but one step at a time. 

I have learned one thing though. I've realised that if I were to boil down what I wish our education system could deliver to our kids - it's Confidence, Curiousity, and the ability to Collaborate. Much more useful than chasing Cars, Condos and Country Club memberships in my view.

When I was a kid, the acceptable middle class professions were Doctor, Lawyer, Engineer. The path seemed pretty clear cut. In this century however, who knows what types of jobs the future will deliver? 10 years ago, the phrase "Social Media Strategist" hardly existed. What will work look like when these 8 year olds start their professions?

This much I do know - curiousity would propel kids to ask questions, look for answers and find ever better ways of doing things; confidence would give them the self-belief to understand they have to be masters of their destinies. And they could be the smartest kids on earth, but without enough emotional intelligence to collaborate with others, the highest IQ in the world wouldn't help a bright child live up to his or her potential.

How Do Mozzies See - and other big questions

A really astounding morning at Whampoa today!

My friend and fellow volunteer Hui-e and I attended TEDxSingapore a couple of weeks ago and saw a video of TED Prize winner Sugata Mitra talk about his experiments with Self Organised Learning Environments and the future of learning: http://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_build_a_school_in_the_cloud.html

So, we tried it out at Whampoa with our 7-12 year olds. today. In a nutshell:

• Ching-Hua and Priya (both also volunteers) worked on what Mitra called the "Big" questions - aimed at piqueing kids' curiousity. The questions had to be phrased in a not too concrete manner to leave room for, well, thinking.
• We asked the kids to pick their own groups of four...one group had three because we had 11 kids today. 
• Each group selected a question from our list:
• How do mosquitoes see?
• Why's the sky blue?
• Where does petrol come from?
• Then we left them the heck alone. Kinda. Each group had a "helper" who were the only conduit to the volunteers and vice versa. So, if they had questions, the helper had to speak to an adult. If there were things the kids were unhappy with, they had to go through the helper.

I gotta tell ya - I wasn't sure where this would go. I'd been fully prepared that some kids would run around, not want to do the work, prefer to be at the playground or playing boardgames. But wow, they all got down to it.

Glowing at S-cubed. Or - fun with e.coli

Here's a Saturday with a difference.

 My friend Sierin kindly opened her lab to a small group of students. Her friend's two teenagers, my friend's teenage son, and S, a ten-year-old from the Whampao neighborhood. The agenda: show the kids how scientists make proteins fluoresce and why. She also introduced the kids to her grad students who were researching cancer. The kids could see how the fluorescent proteins acted as "tags" and how they were solving real world issues. Three hours of microscopes, pipettes, e.coli, agar, and anatomy lab time (that was where the microscope was. And the kids knocked down Mr Skeleton - but that's another story).

The older kids had already been taking biology - so, no problem there. Another friend Ching-Hua, from IBM Research, did some extra " translation" for S  - helpful for me too! We were worried that it was all too much for S - but today, a staffer at Beyond Social Services told us how on a recent outing, S told her all about what she saw and did at the lab. S is also writing about it in her personal "newsletter." 

My thought- nevermind if  S didn't get all the ins and outs of e.coli and proteins (I didn't!). She had fun, she learned, she's interested.

A related note - I came across a TED Talk by 2013 Ted Prize winner Sugata Mitra. He's been experimenting with kids self-learning in Indian villages by plonking PCs in holes in the wall and coming back to find the kids were teaching other kids to use the computers - with no adult intervention. He then upped the ante is slight dose of adult involvement aka British Grannies.

He's now experimenting with Self Organised Learning Environments in which kids, in groups of four, are armed with one computer and a "helper"go researching Big Topics like "Why are whales the largest mammals on earth." And the kids research and present. Post-its, markers - and a framework for us adults. 

Check it out at http://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_build_a_school_in_the_cloud.html

We're going to try this out at Whampoa. We'll let you know how it goes. 

Meanwhile...we've received feedback from parents that the kids go home saying that they played games and had fun. Parents want to know "why isn't there more rote learning?" I guess we're doing something right. Next step - convince the parents that fun+learning = more effective.

New Quarter, New Program - "ish"

Different (learning) Strokes for Different Folks

It's been an interesting first quarter at the Whampoa Learning program. We received government funding for a reading program and it came with books, lesson plans, games, worksheets, and a trained teacher.

For an entirely volunteer-run learning/ literacy program serving a community in which the kids come from families that don't speak English at home,  those resources were really welcome. Now, that 20-week program's just finished, we've learned a lot. My personal takeaway: materials are just one element of any program. It's really about the individuals: the students and the volunteers.

Having books that were adjusted to 10 or so different reading levels is fab. Having a readymade resource meant untrained volunteers like us (mostly corporate people or high school students) didn't have to go the web looking for what we thought was the right level of material.

The worksheets we were given provided a great framework - but man...which 6-12 year-old would want to spend Satruday morning doing more worksheets - black and white ones at that! The lesson plans that came with those were okay...they were kinda  - dry and academic. (They tried). Again - why come in on Saturdays to do more of the same?

The games: now THOSE were winners. They were board games/ matching games...aimed at having kids learn how words are formed, what letters sound like...and for kids who come from families who don't really speak English, those have been a lot of help and fun.

We also had a KPI that there was no way we could have met: 75% attendance. And ours is a non-compulsory program comprising a mish-mash of neighborhood kids of varying abilities and levels of interest. And believe me - academics is not an interest. Kids were free to come or not come - depending on whether their parents felt it was important, whether they woke up on time that day, whether they felt like coming, whether there was food on the table...a myriad reasons.

We had a class list of about 40 kids of which about 6-12 would show up on any given weekend. And they weren't always the same kids. Absenteeism was a huge issue. Because it meant the previous week's work couldn't be built on. And it also meant that volunteers often outnumbered kids. Or vice versa. Neither provided a good learning environment.

So, now that our 20-week program is done, we're keeping the books, the games, and we're chucking out the worksheets and the uh...regimented lesson plans. The program directors also did something really really key. They culled the kids.

Here's what was different today:

The staff of the organisation we volunteer for, which includes trained social workers and community workers, went through the list to work out which kids should be part of the program. The kids had to want to be part of the program, had to be able to work with others in groups, and we also needed their parents' support and commitment. So, from 40 kids, we now have a list of 15 - of which we're targetting a regular attendance of 10 per week.

We had 8 kids today, almost all of whom showed up on time. On previous weekends, most of them would saunter in 20 minutes late.

Today we started with "Phonics Charade" in which a pair of kids in one team would be given a letter or a pair of letters. Say "E" or "CH". The kids would need to act out a word that started with the letter/s and the team would guess what the word, letter, and sound were.

Then, we got the kids to do some debate prep. Today's motion: Exams are a neccesary part of school. Interestingly, the kids and volunteers self-selected and were pretty evenly divided. Volunteers provided discussion scaffolding to broaden the arguments beyond "Exams aren't neccesary because we don't like them." (Yeah kid, I didn't either. I feel your pain.) Next session, the kids will continue the discussion and present their points in their groups - in whatever way, shape or form. Skit, rap, collage - whatever - it doesn't matter. As long as it's communicated.

Then came reading time. Or, the kids could choose the board games. Most of them chose reading.

In all, a pretty peaceful and productive morning. The kids were the "right" kids. They wanted to be there. So, we're OK for now.

In the meantime, the Centre is working on an assessment program based on Gardner's Multiple  Intelliegences: verbal/ linguistic, logical/mathematical, spatial/ visual, bodily/ kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=SG&v=l2QtSbP4FRg&hl=en-GB.


His theory is that human beings have different ways of processing and learning information. Our current education system, especially in this country, is mostly geared toward those who do well in the verbal/linguistics and logical/ mathematical part of the spectrum. So now the centre is working on finding out what each kid's strengths are, and then building a curriculum with volunteers from within and outside educational so that the program is adapted to the kids.

After five years volunteering at the program, I'm realising that we're just at the beginning of the journey. I'm excited that a roadmap is being drawn to suit individual kids - and that individual volunteers will be able to contribute based on their strengths as well.

I'm hopeful that this program be impactful - and that impact will go beyond those who do well in the traditionally academic areas of reading, writing and 'rithmetic.

We're in the 21st century after all.

KPIs of a 14-year-old

Conversation with a 14-year-old that I'm working with at Whampoa:

Me: So, for the December holidays, would you rather continue doing mock test papers or do a project on something you really care about - like Education or Environment ...

14-year-old: I'd rather continue with the papers because that's what I get tested on at school.

Me: Don't you do projects at school? Aren't they more fun than assessments?

14-year-old: Projects are only 10% of my school grades. So I think I'll stick to assessments.

 I posted this on facebook, and one of my friends who's in marketing posted back "Same happens in corporates with high variable pay... It's my target... Therefore..."

The education system in Singapore is really, really working on changing. It's been in the media a lot in the past few months and I truly believe it's more than a PR exercise. We're working on putting play into school, building more resilient, adaptable kids. About time too - and I hope this works.

In the meantime, we've already drummed it in many young minds. These young minds will grow up. 

And I hope that one day, someone will tell them, as a teacher in highschool told me when I was 16: "Don't confuse academics with education."

Another told me that if she had to school between the two, she'd rather be wise than clever.

Me, I'm still learning.

Year Up: The ABCs of Bridging the Opportunity Divide

The other ABCs: a lightbulb moment

Went running Sunday morning listening to BBC's World Business Report podcast and heard about how American non-profit Year Up helps young school leavers skill up to get jobs. BBC World Business Report Podcast. (Oct 5, 5 minute mark)

Their pitch: over the next 10 years, American companies will face a shortage of 14 million qualitied workers. Yet, there is a slew of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds for whom the US education system hasn't adequately served. The result: they're unable to take up these jobs.. Link to Year Up's site

Year Up's mission? Skill up 5 million bright young adults from economically disvantaged backgrounds to gear them up to meet the demands of the working world. The student BBC interviewed talked about learning Outlook, Word and Excel - things you and I take for granted. She also learned technical IT skills - adding that being able to take apart a computer and put it back together again helped her gain confidence. She's now one of the 84% of Year Up's graduates who are employed or attending university full-time within four months of completing the program.

The program's website lists four pillars of focus: Support, College Credits, Job Skills and Internships.

But what really struck me was how the Year Up's spokesperson distilled the program to three key elements. He called them ABCs:

• Attitude
• Behaviour
• Collaboration

Skills are key, of course. Even in Singapore, we've got tons of kids with skills. 

What's not so easy to get across is the importance of Attitude, Behaviour and Collaboration - crucial in the workplace but invisible on a report card. You can't really test for these ABCs and I haven't certainly seen these qualities discussed or emphasised in the current debate on our education system and standardised testing. 

Maybe we've forgotten these ABCs in our rank-based, race-to-the-top, report-card based Type A school system. Maybe we owe it to our kids to help them, and ourselves, remember that these qualities are the fundamentals of a knowledge-based society - or any society for that matter. 

I have to say I'm as guilty as anyone. As a volunteer at the Beyond Social Services @ Whampoa, I keep asking about measureable KPIs in the kids' reading program we're working on. The Year Up interview has made me change my mind somewhat. Don't get me wrong, visible progress is still important to me. I feel strongly that without good English fundamentals, these kids are disadvantged in a way that middle class kids from English-speaking homes aren't.

But I'll need to keep reminding myself that the goal of spending time with the 6 to 12 year olds isn't just about helping them put together vowels and consonants. It's also to show, by example, the importance of the other ABCs.

Chilling Lessons - from Kids

Interactive Museum Exhibit. Like our classes: organised chaos

Things were going pretty well this morning. Ok - who am I kidding. The kids weren't settling down, they were running around, chattering, banging on the keys on the classroom piano. One boy in particular, let's call him Miko, was refusing to join the group when the other kids finally were starting to quiet down and the control freak in me was going slightly nuts. 

Miko ran to the bookshelf and started pulling on magazines and ... a rag.

Were we regressing? I wondered. Things seemed so much more peaceful when we had the 9-12 year olds only and we had our "one conversation at a time" rule. It had taken a long while, but we'd gotten to the point in which we didn't even need to raise our voices to get the kids' attention - just raise our hand to indicate we were about to talk.

Now we've got everyone from 6 up, proportionally fewer volunteers, and for a few long minutes, it felt like bedlam.

Which Comes First: Fun or Structure?

We're two weeks into a new reading program at the Whampoa Family Service Centre and I'm psyched.

It's a 20-week program that's funded - ie. we have REAL books for kids of different reading ability, we have sample lesson plans, worksheets, and a trained educator to help us and show us the ropes. Oh, and I think we'll be gettin' learning games at some point. You cannot believe how great that feels.

We're learning some really valuable skills from Georgina, our allied educator - who's open enough to tell us she hasn't worked with kids like ours before and that she's learning along with us. She's a gem.

Are the kids still doing wheelies on chairs? Yes.
Are they still disrepectful? Yes, some, but a lot less than a year ago and it's nothing that worries me.
Is it still difficult to get them to sit still? Yes - but they're kids. Anyone of you who hasn't been IMing or doing email while on conference calls may throw the first stone.

Snow in Spring

Went to Juizaigou near Chengdu last month, Easter Weekend.

It was snowing when I arrived, not what I'd bargained for. Fortunately, six years in Chicago and NY had taught me the value of layering. Still, I'd been hoping for warmer weather, non-slippery tracks on the mountains, and really nice colours for photography.

So, as I'm climbing down Huanglong (took the cable car up...I'm not THAT tough), I'm thinking - maybe I shoulda come later in the year, like the OTHER tourists. Fewer puddles on the ground, more water in the springs, fewer layers needed...then, I finally got to the "Five Colour Pond"  - and wow. Surrounded by snow, the crystal blue water was in what looked like a series of nature's own infinity pools. I could hear crackles as snow melted and water trickled down the descending lakes. That one moment was worth the trip and worth the trek.

I'd been feeling kinda down about the learning program that my friends and I were working on at Whampoa. Attendance is inconsistent: 18 kids one week, and then 8 for the next few is frustrating. I want to impact more kids, not just a few! And we've got some really great, passionate volunteers who work hard to make learning fun - and they REALLY care about the kids. Engineers, graphic designers and marketing execs have little enough leisure time as it is...wouldn't more kids mean better ROI? I was mentally calculating their billable rates and dividing it by the number of kids in class.

Yes, the kids' behaviour had improved tremendously over the past three years, but was there any way of empirically measuring impact?

Ground Rules Part 1

 At the beginning of the year, we started discussing values with the kids. Got a great curriculum with lesson plans and worksheets called Values: for Lifelong Learners.

It's NOTHING preachy at all. The first exercise revolved around what we value in our friends - there was a list of about 21 words (great for vocab exercise) and then the kids had to vote on their top 5 and say why.

What came next surprised me. Their top 5 were:

1. Kind and caring

2. Honest (tied with the two below)

2. Integrity

2. Hardworking

5. Tough/ strong.

Qualities like curious, articulate, talented were low on the totem pole. Energetic and ambitious were somewhere in the middle. But what gave me pause was...if Kindness and Caring are on top, then how did tough/ strong, which seemed to me like polar opposites of caring - make it so far up the list?